bcarlin.net/posts/000/004/article.md
2025-02-01 23:30:20 +01:00

176 lines
4.5 KiB
Markdown

---
tags: [Python, Buzhug, Database, Locks]
slug: locking-buzhug
title: Locking Buzhug
date: "2012-02-07"
---
I have recently decided to work with [Buzhug] on a project. As far as I can tell,
it has proven efficient, fast, easy to use and to maintain. However, I ran into
a few gotchas.
[Buzhug]: http://buzhug.sourceforge.net
Simple solutions are often the best
===================================
I came to use Buzhug for the following requirements:
- I needed a single table
- I did not want to add additional dependencies to the project
- The size of the table will average 5K entries (without having more than
10k entries in peaks)
And an additional (personal) one:
- I did not want to bother with SQL. Really not. no way!
That left me one option: pure-python embedded database.
After having considered a few libraries, I have been seduced by the way Buzhug
interface is close to manipulating python objects. And the benchmarks seemed
to show that it is performant enough for this project.
After a quick prototyping (1 day), the choice was done.
Then came a few weeks of development and the first stress tests...
And the real world came back fast
=================================
A few times a day, the application backed by this database is intensely used:
- It can be run up to 50 times simultaneously in separate python process
- Each run makes a read and a write/delete operation
This causes a race condition on the files used to store data, and concurent
writes corrupts database.
Using `buzhug.TS_Base` instead of `buzhug.Base` did not solve anything,
as the problem is not thread, but processes. What I need is a system-wide
cross-process lock.
Here is the answer
==================
First step was to find how to implement a cross-process, system-wide lock.
As it only has to work on Linux, the
[Lock class given by Chris from
Vmfarms](http://blog.vmfarms.com/2011/03/cross-process-locking-and.html) fits
perfectly. Here is a version slightly modified to make it a context manager :
{{< highlight python >}}
import fcntl
class PsLock:
"""
Taken from:
http://blog.vmfarms.com/2011/03/cross-process-locking-and.html
"""
def __init__(self, filename):
self.filename = filename
self.handle = open(filename, 'w')
# Bitwise OR fcntl.LOCK_NB if you need a non-blocking lock
def acquire(self):
fcntl.flock(self.handle, fcntl.LOCK_EX)
def release(self):
fcntl.flock(self.handle, fcntl.LOCK_UN)
def __del__(self):
self.handle.close()
def __exit__(self, exc_type, exc_val, exc_tb):
if exc_type is None:
pass
self.release()
def __enter__(self):
self.acquire()
{{< /highlight >}}
The second step is to define a new class that inheritates from `buzhug.Base`
that uses `PsLock` (inspired by `TS_Base`):
{{< highlight python >}}
import buzhug
_lock = PsLock("/tmp/buzhug.lck")
class PS_Base(buzhug.Base):
def create(self,*args,**kw):
with _lock:
res = buzhug.Base.create(self,*args,**kw)
return res
def open(self,*args,**kw):
with _lock:
res = buzhug.Base.open(self,*args,**kw)
return res
def close(self,*args,**kw):
with _lock:
res = buzhug.Base.close(self,*args,**kw)
return res
def destroy(self,*args,**kw):
with _lock:
res = buzhug.Base.destroy(self,*args,**kw)
return res
def set_default(self,*args,**kw):
with _lock:
res = buzhug.Base.set_default(self,*args,**kw)
return res
def insert(self,*args,**kw):
with _lock:
res = buzhug.Base.insert(self,*args,**kw)
return res
def update(self,*args,**kw):
with _lock:
res = buzhug.Base.update(self,*args,**kw)
return res
def delete(self,*args,**kw):
with _lock:
res = buzhug.Base.delete(self,*args,**kw)
return res
def cleanup(self,*args,**kw):
with _lock:
res = buzhug.Base.cleanup(self,*args,**kw)
return res
def commit(self,*args,**kw):
with _lock:
res = buzhug.Base.commit(self,*args,**kw)
return res
def add_field(self,*args,**kw):
with _lock:
res = buzhug.Base.add_field(self,*args,**kw)
return res
def drop_field(self,*args,**kw):
with _lock:
res = buzhug.Base.drop_field(self,*args,**kw)
return res
{{< /highlight >}}
Now I just use
{{< highlight python >}}
database = PS_Base( ... )
{{< /highlight >}}
And all the errors have vanished.