--- slug: 4-locking-buzhug title: Locking Buzhug date: "2012-02-07T00:00:00+01:00" categories: [Dev] tags: - Python - Buzhug summary: > How to implement a cross-process, system-wide lock for Buzhug --- I have recently decided to work with [Buzhug] on a project. As far as I can tell, it has proven efficient, fast, easy to use and to maintain. However, I ran into a few gotchas. [Buzhug]: http://buzhug.sourceforge.net ## Simple Solutions Are Often The Bests I came to use Buzhug for the following requirements: - I needed a single table - I did not want to add additional dependencies to the project - The size of the table will average 5K entries (without having more than 10k entries in peaks) And an additional (personal) one: - I did not want to bother with SQL. Really not. no way! That left me one option: pure-python embedded database. After having considered a few libraries, I have been seduced by the way Buzhug interface is close to manipulating python objects. And the benchmarks seemed to show that it is performant enough for this project. After a quick prototyping (1 day), the choice was done. Then came a few weeks of development and the first stress tests... ## And The Real World Came Back Fast A few times a day, the application backed by this database is intensely used: - It can be run up to 50 times simultaneously in separate python process - Each run makes a read and a write/delete operation This causes a race condition on the files used to store data, and concurent writes corrupts database. Using `buzhug.TS_Base` instead of `buzhug.Base` did not solve anything, as the problem is not thread, but processes. What I need is a system-wide cross-process lock. ## Here Is The Answer First step was to find how to implement a cross-process, system-wide lock. As it only has to work on Linux, the [Lock class given by Chris from Vmfarms](http://blog.vmfarms.com/2011/03/cross-process-locking-and.html) fits perfectly. Here is a version slightly modified to make it a context manager : ```python import fcntl class PsLock: """ Taken from: http://blog.vmfarms.com/2011/03/cross-process-locking-and.html """ def __init__(self, filename): self.filename = filename self.handle = open(filename, 'w') # Bitwise OR fcntl.LOCK_NB if you need a non-blocking lock def acquire(self): fcntl.flock(self.handle, fcntl.LOCK_EX) def release(self): fcntl.flock(self.handle, fcntl.LOCK_UN) def __del__(self): self.handle.close() def __exit__(self, exc_type, exc_val, exc_tb): if exc_type is None: pass self.release() def __enter__(self): self.acquire() ``` The second step is to define a new class that inheritates from `buzhug.Base` that uses `PsLock` (inspired by `TS_Base`): ```python import buzhug _lock = PsLock("/tmp/buzhug.lck") class PS_Base(buzhug.Base): def create(self, *args, **kw): with _lock: res = buzhug.Base.create(self, *args, **kw) return res def open(self, *args, **kw): with _lock: res = buzhug.Base.open(self, *args, **kw) return res def close(self, *args, **kw): with _lock: res = buzhug.Base.close(self, *args, **kw) return res def destroy(self, *args, **kw): with _lock: res = buzhug.Base.destroy(self, *args, **kw) return res def set_default(self, *args, **kw): with _lock: res = buzhug.Base.set_default(self, *args, **kw) return res def insert(self, *args, **kw): with _lock: res = buzhug.Base.insert(self, *args, **kw) return res def update(self, *args, **kw): with _lock: res = buzhug.Base.update(self, *args, **kw) return res def delete(self, *args, **kw): with _lock: res = buzhug.Base.delete(self, *args, **kw) return res def cleanup(self, *args, **kw): with _lock: res = buzhug.Base.cleanup(self, *args, **kw) return res def commit(self, *args, **kw): with _lock: res = buzhug.Base.commit(self, *args, **kw) return res def add_field(self, *args, **kw): with _lock: res = buzhug.Base.add_field(self, *args, **kw) return res def drop_field(self, *args, **kw): with _lock: res = buzhug.Base.drop_field(self, *args, **kw) return res ``` Now I just use ```python database = PS_Base( ... ) ``` And all the errors have vanished.